Speaker McCarthy, who is now facing a conservative uprising against his leadership after just 8 months as Speaker, remarked defiantly on Saturday, “If somebody wants to remove because I want to be the adult in the room, go ahead and try,”
However, Rep. Matt Gaetz, a staunch critic of McCarthy, is poised to do just that. Gaetz, a far-right Republican from Florida, has signaled his intent to deploy a “motion to vacate” – a powerful procedural tool – to potentially unseat McCarthy as early as this week. This move comes after McCarthy leaned on Democratic votes to secure government funding. Gaetz, speaking on CNN, asserted, “It’s time for a change. We need leadership that’s reliable.”
Understanding the Motion to Vacate
The motion to vacate allows any House member, irrespective of party affiliation, to challenge the speaker’s position. While it’s a potent tool, it’s been rarely used, with only two instances in the last 100 years. However, its recent resurgence among conservatives as a tool of dissent is noteworthy.
Earlier this year, in a bid to placate hardline conservatives, McCarthy conceded to allowing as few as five Republican members to initiate a vote for his removal. Yet, facing continued pressure, he further reduced this number to just one, aligning with historical precedent.
The last notable use of this motion was in 2015 by then-Rep. Mark Meadows, who later served as Donald Trump’s White House chief of staff. While no speaker has been ousted using this method, its mere mention has historically sent ripples through the House’s leadership.
The Mechanics of the Motion
A member can introduce this privileged resolution at any time, prioritizing it over other measures. Once tabled, a vote must be scheduled within two legislative days. While various procedural tactics can delay or halt the process, a simple majority – 218 votes when all seats are filled – is required to unseat the speaker.
Historically, this motion has been more of a political gambit than a genuine threat. For instance, in 1910, Republican Speaker Joseph Cannon cleverly used the resolution against himself to expose and quash dissent within his ranks.
The Forces Against McCarthy
The echoes of Boehner’s past challenges resonate as Gaetz, a member of the hardline House Freedom Caucus, leads the charge against McCarthy. Gaetz, along with approximately 20 other members, has consistently opposed McCarthy’s leadership bids. Rep. Mike Lawler, R-N.Y., a McCarthy supporter, lamented on ABC, “This entire situation is being jeopardized by one individual’s political ambitions, undermining the collective will.”
Critics argue that McCarthy has deviated from core conservative values, pointing to his agreement with the White House on the debt ceiling and calls for reduced government spending. They also express concerns about a government they view as increasingly out of touch.
The Odds of Success
While the anti-McCarthy faction is vocal, it remains a minority within the larger Republican conference. The absence of a unified candidate to replace McCarthy further complicates matters. Moreover, for the motion to succeed, Gaetz would need significant Democratic support, which remains uncertain.
Gaetz, recognizing this, has been courting House Democrats to gauge potential support. However, Democratic Leader Hakeem Jeffries remains non-committal, stating, “We’ll address it when the time comes.”
The Aftermath of a Successful Motion
Should the motion pass, the House would venture into uncharted waters. The speaker is mandated to maintain a list of potential interim leaders. The top name on this list would oversee the election of a new speaker, a process that could be lengthy and contentious, as evidenced by McCarthy’s 15-round election in January. While new contenders might emerge, there’s nothing preventing a McCarthy re-nomination.
In this intricate dance of power and politics, the House’s future leadership remains a riveting spectacle to watch.